Good at Looking
  • Good at Looking blog
  • About Good at Looking
  • Contact Good at Looking

Questioning the rules of engagement

28/5/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
​Intimate but large, respectful yet confrontational. The Hayward Gallery's exhibition on the early work of photographer Diane Arbus makes space for such contradictions. The curator of the exhibition, Jeff Rosenheim, describes Arbus' approach as one in which she was an active participant: 'For Arbus the experience of engaging with her subjects was what she was looking for. She was not trying to steal a picture. She wanted everyone to know what she was doing.' While many of her contemporaries exploring street photography were hidden behind the camera and 'followed the Henri Cartier-Bresson mode of photography: get in, get out quickly, don’t get hurt', as Rosenheim notes, 'Arbus wanted to get hurt. She wanted that confrontation'. She was, he says, making us question the rules of engagement.
 
That vulnerability is part of what attracts people to Arbus' work, and it is echoed in her own life. It is echoed too in the design of the exhibition, which requires viewers to decide how they want to view. There is no prescribed route, unlike in most exhibitions which lead the viewer by the hand, chronologically, thematically. Here, what order in which to view the photos, how to view them, whether to view them all – all these decisions rest with the viewer, and with them the responsibility for their experience.
 
Art historian Alexander Nemerov writes about a particular type of courage shown by Arbus, the aunt he never met but who was a feature in his life, if only as a secret in the house in which he grew up. His father and Diane's brother, the poet Howard Nemerov, stashed in a drawer a photo Diane inscribed to him; he seemed to find her work repugnant. In Silent Dialogues[1], the younger Nemerov describes his father's and aunt's different approaches to their art in a way that reflects the sensibility of the Hayward Gallery's display of Arbus' earlier work:
 
'Arbus had the courage not only to bend photography over backward but to bend her own written eloquence backward, too, all to portray what the floating balls and the shimmering pools and the crystalline fountains do not: namely, some dumbness beyond her mind. The world for my father responded only to his intelligence - the balls spin because, as he put it in another poem, "The mind's eye lit the sun." Nothing moves, nothing glows, not the wasp on the beach ball, not the fire spouting from the star, but that the poet's mind makes it. Arbus, by contrast, could see the world as it was without her. She simply gave it the chance to be as it was.'
 
In Arbus' work, Nemerov writes, the 'dumbness' or blankness is a vacancy in which 'the world discloses itself'. Facilitating this disclosure was the role Arbus saw for herself.
 
 
Diane Arbus: in the beginning, at the Hayward Gallery, 13 Feb-6 May 2019
 
 


[1] Alexander Nemerov, Silent Dialogues: Diane Arbus & Howard Nemerov, San Francisco, CA: Fraenkel Gallery, 2015
0 Comments

The warp and weft of democratic engagement

27/1/2019

0 Comments

 
“If the people are not utterly degraded, although individually they may be worse judges than those who have special knowledge, as a body they are as good or better.” Aristotle

​If you're someone who watches select committee hearings on Parliament TV (I confess I am), you might have noticed an intriguing backdrop to proceedings in the Thatcher Room at Portcullis House. Recently, while watching an evidence session of the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Select Committee (PACAC), I was struck by the relevance of the artwork – a tapestry called Democracy, by Pat Taylor – to current debates here on Brexit and the role of Parliament.

Picture
Pat Taylor, Democracy I, http://pat-taylor.com/democracy.php
​Taylor, a weaver who was formerly Director of the Tapestry Studio at West Dean College, was commissioned in 1999 by Parliament's Advisory Commission on Works of Art to design two tapestries: Democracy I and Democracy II. Each took about 11 months to make, in the studios at West Dean. It is the first of the two tapestries that graces the Thatcher Room at Portcullis House, hanging behind the Committee chair in hearings on the relationship between citizen and state, the bread and butter of PACAC proceedings.
 
These days, in what Julian Baggini has called 'the rise of degenerative democracy', demands that the will of 'the people' must be enacted have led to our constitutional crisis over Brexit in the UK and the demagoguery of President Trump in the US. Populist parties are on the rise throughout the world, threatening the protection of minority rights and interests and norms of good governance and accountability. 
Picture
Pat Taylor, Democracy I, http://pat-taylor.com/democracy.php
Exploring the place of people and their representatives in a parliamentary democracy., Taylor uses both text and imagery within her tapestries as social and political commentary. In Democracy I, a composite image shows both mirrored and blurred people as a metaphor for debate. The text is based on responses to letters she sent to a random selection of 300 MPs, asking them to provide a definition of democracy on an enclosed postcard and return it to her. The responses were illuminating. Many quoted Abraham Lincoln; former Labour MP Ken Livingston wrote that democracy is the right to vote for him as Mayor of London; one referred to 'endless talking'. It's a sad reflection on the quality of some of our representatives that 20 MPs said they were too busy and didn't have time to define democracy. A selection of the most frequently used words in the responses was incorporated into the bottom half of the weaving, in different sizes and colours, running like film credits of keywords of democratic engagement: 'equality', 'participation', 'suffrage', 'consent', 'accountable'.
 
Taylor says that some people, including MPs, were baffled why Aristotle's name appears in the tapestry. Some MPs may have included Aristotle in their responses, but also Taylor's intention was to reflect her understanding that Aristotle considered democracy, for all its flaws, as the best form of government, that if individuals pool their virtues they are better at governing as a whole than a few elites. A useful reminder at times like these, when little 'virtue' is on display and it is a few elites who have brought the people and our democracy to this sorry impasse. But linking Aristotle and democracy is problematic; aside from the fact that entire parts of the population were excluded from governing, and today his prescription of government by the virtuous can be read as both elitist and as fuel to populist calls for direct rule of the majority.

​For some, the referendum on the EU in 2016 was sold as an opportunity to restore Parliamentary sovereignty; its result is now being used to undermine the role of Parliament. As Julian Baggini notes, 'the constitutional obstacles that stand between the expression of the people’s will and its enacting are actually the best protection we have against the tyranny of the many over the few, or of leaders who claim to represent all while really standing only for themselves.'
0 Comments

Lost & found at the V&A…

7/8/2018

1 Comment

 
…a series inspired by my experiences as a volunteer Welcoming Ambassador at the Victoria & Albert Museum

The importance of thresholds and seams

'In the universe, there are things that are known, and things that are unknown,
and in between them, there are doors.'

William Blake
Picture
'Threshold' is a bridge from light to dark, from the known to the unknown, and it holds the potential for both fascination and terror. Mae Architects describe it as 'transition space', as 'enfilade' of space, which leaves areas of doubt between spaces and their use, such as between inhabitation and 'transition'. In their book of essays, Places for Strangers (2014), they give examples, such as the quadrangles and courts of Oxford and Cambridge colleges, of enfilades offering 'space to dwell, to move, to encounter'.
 
The V&A's threshold space
 
The opening of the V&A's new Exhibition Road entrance in June 2017 changed the relationship between the museum and the spaces and places on Exhibition Road, including the National History Museum and the Science Museum. The design, by Amanda Levete Architects, also links in (almost) seamlessly with the Shared Space design of the road; a Dutch innovation, Shared Space is a counterintuitive approach to road safety that involves removing the usual barriers, signs and traffic lights that separate pedestrians from cars. Recently, V&A Director Tristram Hunt suggested that the new entrance had helped the museum attract a 26% increase in visitors and that one factor is that the new entrance is less intimidating than the grand 'castle keep' way in on Cromwell Road. “All the data we have shows that it is much more attractive to non-traditional museumgoers,” said Hunt. “It is less, frankly, scary.” (The Guardian, 18 July 2018).
 
The new entrance also created a 'transition zone' as recognition that entering the museum (any museum) can be intimidating for some visitors. On the V&A's blog, Kati Price explains:
 
'The new Sackler Courtyard offers a ‘decompression zone’ – a threshold space between the busy Exhibition Road and the Museum itself. Like plazas, parks and entrance courtyards to other museums, this threshold space allows people to enjoy the beautiful surroundings without having to commit to entering the building. These are important transitionary spaces, helping to ease people into the Museum which – for some – can be intimidating.'
 
My experience as a Welcoming Ambassador at the V&A is that people using the new courtyard are often confused as to whether or not they are in the museum – indeed some aren't even aware it is a museum. It intrigues while at the same time giving the impression of being open to all – even if they don't always know what 'it' is.
 
Yet the effect achieved may not be what was intended, and partly that's down to the unpredictability of people. Price describes the ambitions for a 'digital welcome' to the museum, using apps and other digital technologies to help visitors explore the museum and its collections and heritage. But she notes that so much changed from 2012, when that ambition was originally set out, in terms of technology but also in the understanding of people's behaviour. What she and colleagues discovered is that instead of focusing on the 'digital welcome', they needed to take a step back and consider what people wanted, realising that 'to separate out the digital from other elements of the welcome experience risks a fragmented visitor experience that doesn’t intuitively blend the digital and the physical'. They attempted to map the 'visitor experience' – the physical, as in spaces in the museum, and the emotional, the visitor's responses to what she saw. This gave them fresh insights into the way the museum was using digital technology and 'touchpoints', not always to best effect. And it emphasised that real people – the staff and volunteers 'on the shop floor' – were a necessary ingredient.
 
This stepping back also taught the V&A that digital offerings (apps, maps and information) are ever only part of the story – people still want stuff on paper, and they want the right information at the right time. Price summarises the key learning points as:
  • Recognise our people as a vital part of the experience
  • Make our touchpoints more visible
  • Define a clear purpose for each touchpoint
  • Make a more consistent experience
  • Provide the right information at the right time
 
These may seem like obvious, 'Mom and apple pie' type revelations – who wouldn't argue for more consistency and recognising people as vital ingredients? – but they are in fact a reflection of how far the vision shifted from the original 'digital by default' vision set out in the V&A's Heritage Lottery Fund application. (I'm struck by the parallels with the justice system. I'm currently working with a colleague on a book project on administrative justice and human rights, and how the two can be re-imagined with the help of the world of design. There is much in what the V&A learned that is relevant for digitalisation of the justice system, which, like any major museum with historic but confusing architecture, can be daunting to first-time visitors. But one key difference is that the V&A's strategy is to get more people into the museum. The HMCTS's strategy may well be to keep people out of its system, to make the workload more manageable and to keep costs down. That at least is a widely shared sceptical view of the intentions of the current justice reform programme.)

People and their places – connectivity and threshold
Picture
Places, Rachel Whiteread, Museum of Childhood
Recognising the importance of threshold, of transition space, may reflect a new and different approach to user focus in design, one that is looser, indeed less designed. The role of users in design has changed over the past 100 years, and now the imperative is to engage with users, not as individual consumers but as a collective, as part of the 'civic condition', and as co-designers. Design thinker Ezio Manzini suggests that connectivity is one of the keys to employing user-centredness in design. The importance of a user-centred approach, one that focuses on communities of 'users', lies in the sense-making role of design and the place of people in that sense-making. Co-design as defined by Manzini is like a multifaceted social conversation in which different actors participate in different ways and at different times. Co-designing with users ensures that the solution (the problem being solved) also has meaning – in fact, it is 'the only way of making sure that the technical solution found will actually be culturally and socially acceptable to the people and communities it is to benefit'. This too may sound uncontroversial, but its application of often more limited in practice, a sort of paying lip service to the needs of the user (consider customer satisfaction surveys as a means of bringing users' views into design and re-design).
 
Mae Architects explore how 'unexpected engagement' is designed into a space by allowing free movement between spaces and 'loose fitting', even advocating for some degree of non-design: 'Architecture which has enough presence to step back and not do the jazz-hands thing in public can be absorbed as part of a city.' Too much coherence locks you in; 'urbanistically being too specific can create monocultures'. Manzini sees connectivity as creating flexibility; it loosens and makes more fluid, in the way that temperature can affect the fluidity of materials.
 
Seams

This plasticity and flexibility and the encounters it can promulgate reflects too the intention of Shared Spaces, as in Exhibition Road just outside the V&A's new entrance. What Hans Monderman (the Dutch engineer who invented the concept of Shared Space) observed was that these safety elements of kerbs, crossings, traffic lights and railings prevent road users from interacting with each other; when lines are blurred between street and pavement, users are forced to look, engage and negotiate with one another, eye to eye. Monderman created more than 100 shared spaces in the Netherlands, and studies he carried out showed a reduction in accidents and no fatalities in Shared Spaces (Toth 2009). Monderman's designs are not seamless – on the contrary, the 'seam' of Shared Space is the ingrained caution hardwired into all of us when using the roads. But this caution is addressed in a fluid way using the age-old technique of eyeballing a fellow human.
 
One problem with user focus in design, noted by urbanist Richard Sennett, is that the trend for 'friction-free' design does away with resistance, with obstacles, with the limbo state of uncertainty. The idea is to design out the 'seams' so that they are invisible to the user. But this also designs out all sorts of serendipitous encounters. Instead, when you 'treat edges as seams', as Mae Architects suggest, thresholds become mediating devices for social exchange.
 
About the author:
 
Margaret Doyle is a Welcoming Ambassador at the V&A and author of the blog Good at Looking (www.goodatlooking.com). She is also a Visiting Research Fellow at the UK Administrative Justice Institute, University of Essex (www.ukaji.org).
 
Sources:
 
Mark Brown, 'V&A's 'less scary' entrance drives up visitor numbers' (The Guardian, 18 July 2018)
 
Mae Architects, Places for Strangers: Ideas for places, people and the city, by Mae Architects, edited by
Shumi Bose (Park Books, 2014)
 
​Ezio Manzini, Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation (MIT Press,
2015)
 
Kati Price, 'Designing a new welcome experience at the V&A' (V&A blog, 9 March 2018),
www.vam.ac.uk/blog/digital/designing-a-new-welcome-experience-at-the-va
 
Richard Sennett, Building and Dwelling (Allen Lane, 2018)
 
Gary Toth, 'Where the sidewalk doesn't end' (Project for Public Spaces, 16 August 2009),
https://www.pps.org/article/shared-space

1 Comment

Bringing the tropics to post-war Britain

3/8/2018

0 Comments

 
'Everything I did I think, I saw it through a tropical eye.'
Althea McNish 

When you look at Golden Harvest, you see Britain transformed by the colours of the Caribbean. Althea McNish (b. 1933), who designed the textile while a student, was inspired by walking through wheatfields near the Essex home of her tutor, Edward Bawden. She had come from Trinidad in the 1950s with her mother, to join her father, who was already working in Britain. As a child, Althea used to help her mother with her dressmaking business – not sewing but sketching – and had already developed as a painter before leaving Trinidad.

​Initially planning to study architecture, she instead enrolled at the London College of Printing, studying screen printing before shifting to the Royal College of Art. There she was urged by Eduaordo Paolozzi, then a teacher at the College, to apply her knowledge of printing and her love of design to textiles. Soon after graduating, her work was spotted by the head of Liberty's, and she received her first commissions that set her off on an international career producing fabrics not only for Liberty's but for designer Zika Ascher for fashion house Dior. She became Britain's first internationally known black textile designer.
 ​
Picture
Photo copyright 2016 @Althea McNish and John Weiss http://www.mcnishandweiss.co.uk/mcnish/GHwww-page.html
​
Golden Harvest was produced by Hull Traders, an innovative textile firm based in Colne in Lancashire, which specialised in artist-designed, screen-printed textiles. The Whitworth Gallery, which holds many of McNish's designs, says that Golden Harvest became their all-time best-selling design, and continued to be manufactured into the 1970s.
Picture
Photo: University of Brighton http://arts.brighton.ac.uk/collections/design-archives/resources/women-designers/althea-mcnish
​McNish designed murals for cruise ships, wall hangings for British Rail. She says that the opportunity to discuss her work with people who appreciated it was special to London at the time; she enjoyed the openness to her fresh approach – she describes the tutors and technician she worked with as simpatico with her and encouraging but also suggests that she was on a different wavelength, 'and that was good'. Like fellow textile artist Enid Marx, she felt the relationship with technicians and printers was an important one. She knew the ins and outs of the technology of producing pattern: 'That’s why I was able to go to the factory and I would say “listen you know how I got that so and so and so and so... I made it myself so it’s a kitchen recipe of sorts. This will give you what you want". And they appreciated the fact that a designer could actually come and talk about it ... I challenged them in their own ground and then they wanted to prove to me that they could do it.' 

​Her husband, John Weiss, himself an artist and designer, says of Althea that 'she introduced tropical color into the field of British textiles, which at that time had been polite, sombre'. (CC) McNish's story is that of the African diaspora: her ancestors had been taken in the 1700s from Africa to Georgia, in the US, and later settled in Trinidad. The Whitworth Gallery suggests that her career as a prominent Black and female artist in 1950s Britain contributed to the growing recognition of multiculturalism within the design world and British culture. He describes it as a form of 'return payment', her textiles as 'a good symbol of the special part of the relationship between the slavery world and the home country. In other words, here was some of the, you might call it, the return, a return payment in quite a different way from whatever might have been thought.' McNish was part of the Caribbean Arts Movement. Weiss notes that because she works in textiles, her work has had a considerable impact on British life, perhaps more than other Caribbean artists because of the role that textiles (furnishing fabrics in particular) have in our daily life.

The work of Althea McNish features in the BBC programme 'Whoever Heard of a Black Artist', about a project led by artist Sonia Boyce to highlight artists of African and Asian descent who have helped to shape the history of British art.ting 
Picture
Photo: Cooper-Hewitt Museum, https://collection.cooperhewitt.org/objects/18441427/images/
Sources:

Christine Checinska (2018) 'Christine Checinska in Conversation with Althea
McNish and John Weiss', TEXTILE, 16:2, 186-199
 
Whitworth Gallery, 'Trade and Empire: Remembering Slavery', 2008-2009,
http://revealinghistories.org.uk/why-was-cotton-so-important-in-north-west-england/objects/fabric-golden-harvest.html
 
McNish and Weiss, http://www.mcnishandweiss.co.uk

0 Comments

Lost & found at the V&A…

9/2/2018

0 Comments

 
…a series inspired by my experiences as a volunteer Welcoming Ambassador at the Victoria & Albert Museum

Sex and intrigue at the Brompton Boilers

Picture
​“Probably no part of London can compete with South Kensington in the wide variety of interest which it offers to vastly different mentalities.”
 
                                                                                           H.V. Morton, In Search of London, 1951
 
Two years ago, one great thing about the David Bowie fever at the V&A was that it enticed people in who might not otherwise have considered visiting the museum. In spite of Morton's generous description of South Ken in 1951, the area isn't now often seen as one catering to 'different mentalities'. As Welcoming Ambassadors, my colleagues and I frequently were approached by visitors who had never been to the V&A, who had timed tickets to enter the Bowie exhibit in an hour, or in twenty minutes, and wanted to know what could they see in that time. It made for some fascinating ‘moments of shared happiness’ (as our mentor and colleague Glyn Christian calls them) and for some challenging moments as well, as we tried to identify which of the many collections in the Museum would spark the interest of a total stranger.
 
I had a couple ask me for advice on what to see for two people who had never met each other. They were young and sparky, and as I described the collections I saw their eyes light up on certain ones. (They settled on Architecture and the 20th Century Gallery.) You have to admit the Museum is an inspired choice of destination for a blind date.
 
I suspect many who don’t know the museum think of it as a stuffy Victorian institution, with objects encased in glass on dark shelves. This stuffiness is well illustrated in a passage from Thomas Crofton Croker’s A Walk from London to Fulham (1860), in which he described the collections of the V&A (then the newly opened South Kensington Museum) in a way that makes a visit seem more worthy than enjoyable:
 
“There are specimens here of ornamental art, an architectural, trade, and economical museum; a court of modern sculpture, and the gallery of British Art… the whole designed with the view of aiding general education, and of diffusing among all classes those principles of science and art which are calculated to advance the individual interests of the country, and to elevate the character of the people…”
 
Yet even back then there was something steamy about the locale. Around the time the Brompton Boilers were built (a nickname for the temporary buildings, used disparagingly by the leading architectural journal of the day, The Builder), Croker described the Brompton area as the locale for illicit activities:
 
“Brompton was formerly an airy outlet to which the citizen, with his spouse, were wont to resort for an afternoon of rustic enjoyment. It had also the reputation of being a locality favourable to intrigue.”
 
The possibilities for intrigue continue today. Of course, everyone’s taste is different, but one of my favourite pieces to inspire misbehavior is in the Sculpture galleries, in room 21: an Art Deco fireplace with a bronze relief by Charles Sargeant Jagger (1885-1934). The fireplace is considered one of the most important features in Mulberry House, in Smith Square, Westminster, designed by Edwin Lutyens. The house's renovation in 1930 was, according to the V&A's description, considered to be 'one of the finest achievements of a fruitful collaboration between interesting and enlightened patrons, an innovative architect and a painter and sculptor.'
 
The relief shows a naked couple part-embracing, part-fleeing a crowd of society ladies looking on in fascinated outrage. It was commissioned by Lord and Lady Melchett (Henry and Gwen Mond) as a reference to the untraditional relationship they enjoyed with the writer Gilbert Cannan.
Picture
Scandal, Charles Sargeant Jagger, 1930, @Victoria & Albert Museum, London
​Reviewing the renovated interiors in Country Life in 1931, Professor C.H. Reilly wrote:
 
'The bronze itself is a very delicate piece of modelling, and seems – if one must find a meaning for it – to represent “Scandal”. The central pair of nude figures – the lovers – while they make an interesting wall pattern, are a very expressive piece of modern sculpture, the angularity of which seems to heighten the emotion. The other figures in the background, making a rich texture with their clothes, are, one supposes, discussing and criticising the lovers – a very proper satire on the ordinary uses of the drawing room.'
 
The story behind this work is one of sexual openness and intrigue and is perhaps more steamy than the sculpture itself. Gwen Wilson, an artist from South Africa who had come to London to study at the Slade, and writer Gilbert Cannan were lovers who lived together in a studio in St John’s Wood. Gilbert had recently divorced from Mary Barrie, having been a co-respondent in the much-publicised divorce between Mary Barrie (a former actress) and J.M. Barrie (author of Peter Pan) in which mary claimed the marriage had not been consummated. Mary and gilbert's marriage itself didn't last long, apparently due to Gilbert's affair with the then 19-year-old Gwen.
 
The story goes that Henry Mond, wealthy heir to a finance business, had a motorbike accident outside the St John's Wood studio in 1918, and Gwen found him injured and helped nurse him to recovery. Mond moved in with Gwen and Gilbert and became their lodger, and eventually, lover (of Gwen) in an open ménage a trois. Two years later, while Gilbert was away on a lecture tour, promoting the work of his friend D.H. Lawrence, Henry and Gwen married. Gilbert, Henry and Gwen continued to live together after Gilbert's return. However, as curator Eric Turner reports, the Mond marriage precipitated Gilbert’s 'final, catastrophic and irreversible mental breakdown', and he was admitted to The Priory hospital in south London, where he remained from 1924 until his death in 1955.
Picture
Henry Mond, 2nd Lord Melchett by Glyn Philpot (1884-1937), 1932. Oil on canvas, 125.7 x 100.4 cm. Robilant & Voena, London and Milan
Picture
Gilbert Cannan in 1916. National Portrait Gallery, London
Picture
Gwen Mond, Lady Melchett by Glyn Philpot (1884-1937), 1935. Oil on canvas, 89.5 x 71.7 cm. National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne
The Monds became a part of the social and political establishment, with a social circle that included a number of artists and, according to the V&A, 'skirted the fringes of the Bloomsbury circle, all of whom were in temperament or sexual mores, outsiders within the establishment'. The Monds' ambiguous relationship with society may have reflected the fact that Henry's family was Jewish and they were keenly 'aware of an undercurrent of anti-Semitism in English attitudes' and may have experienced some discrimination. Their unconventional living arrangements no doubt contributed to a sense of being outside society, although the fireplace they commissioned Jagger to design is more a celebration of the outrage they inspired. It was commissioned several years after Gilbert's breakdown and move to the Priory and pictures Gwen and Gilbert as the fleeing nudes.
 
Intrigue doesn't always turn out well. But no doubt it was all good fodder for the gossip columns of the time.
 
For more details and images of the Mulberry House Art Deco interior, see Eric Turner, 'Art Intimates Life: The Mond "Ménage à Trois"', Apollo Magazine, Sept 2009, http://theesotericcuriosa.blogspot.co.uk/2009/11/art-intimates-life-mond-menage-trois.html
 
0 Comments

Can design help us have difficult conversations?

23/12/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture

​The year of 2017 will be bookended by women speaking out about sexual harassment. And these bookends are both captured visually in two designs created by women: the pink pussyhat and the #metoo hashtag. Both were created as visual symbols of, and means of communicating, women's anger and outrage. They've been hugely influential, spearheading vital and timely campaigns. Yet their adoption has contributed to a wildfire spread in which the original aims and intentions risk being lost. Can these design icons serve as a focal point to help people discuss sexual harassment and improve the level of debate? Or do they serve as visual symbols of the co-option of anger for media and marketing purposes? We need to talk about this, and we need to talk about talking better.

 



PictureTime magazine, February 2017
​The Women's March, January 2017
 
At the Women’s March in January, held throughout the world to protest the inauguration of Donald Trump as US President and misogynist-in-chief, more than 4 million people in 600 cities donned knitted pink hats to show solidarity. The hats are part of the Pussyhat Project, an initiative founded by screenwriter Krista Suh and architect and activist Jayna Zweiman after the 2016 Presidential election. Suh and Zweiman worked with a knitting-shop owner, Kat Coyle, to design the pussyhat, its cat ears inspired by a recording released during the election campaign in which Trump is heard joking with Billy Bush about grabbing women ‘by the pussy’, a form of sexual assault which he discounted as ‘locker room banter’ in his defence.
 
The intention of the Pussyhat Project was to create a striking, collective visual expression of women’s anger. One of the project’s primary aims is to develop meaningful, respectful connections among people who care about women’s rights. The movement also aimed to provide a way for people who couldn’t physically attend a march to join the protest by knitting a hat for a marcher.
 
This origin story echoes the many ways craft and revolution have intersected for hundreds of years  - think Sarah Corbett and her Craftivist Collective, spearheading campaigns to highlight issues of social justice through ‘mindful activism’, ‘reflection and respectful conversation’. Below is one of her projects, quoting Nehru and placed outside Clapham Junction Station in London as a comment on the way women’s voices are often unheard. Corbett explains, ‘Often the boys would have their arms around their girlfriends and the girls would not talk much. It made me uncomfortable and I wanted to challenge it.’ 

Picture
Craftivist Collective
​Like knitting, embroidery is a craft medium (primarily but not exclusively practised by women) that lends itself to rebellion; this blog has in the past quoted Rozsika Parker who, in her book The Subversive Stitch, notes that 'the art of embroidery has been the means of educating women into the feminine ideal and of proving that they have attained it, but it has also provided a weapon of resistance to the constraints of femininity.’ Embroidery can be the unlikely midwife to rebellion; as artist Hannah Hock wrote in her 1918 work On Embroidery, it is an expression of women's assertion as rights-holders: 'But you, craftswomen, modern women, who feel that your spirit is in your work, who are determined to lay claim to your rights (economic and moral), who believe that your feet are firmly planted in reality, at least y-o-u should know that your embroidery work is a documentation of your own era!' And although the Pussyhat movement spread thanks to Instagram, Facebook and other social media, its founders argue that it is committed to real-life engagement and conversations, arguing that ‘in the process of making pussyhats, participants would be connecting with each other and laying the groundwork for future political activism.’
Picture
Victoria and Albert Museum
The pussyhat has achieved icon status as an example of protest design. It has been named as one of the top ten museum acquisitions in 2017, and one is on display in the Victoria & Albert Museum’s Rapid Response Collecting gallery, which explores how current global events, political changes and pop cultural phenomena impact, or are influenced by, design, art, architecture and technology. Corinna Gardner, the V&A's Acting Keeper of the Rapid Response Gallery, explains the importance of the pussyhat:
 
‘This modest pink hat is a material thing which, through its design, enables us to raise questions about our current political and social circumstance. Worn by thousands across the globe on 21 January 2017, the Pussyhat has become an immediately recognisable expression of female solidarity and symbol of the power of collective action.’
​
PictureMihai Surdu, Pixabay.com
​The Weinstein scandal,
​October 2017

 
One of the dangers, however, is that a design icon for a social movement can quickly become adopted as a marketing brand and lose meaning and power – or at least its power can be co-opted by forces that distort the original aims. The pussyhat was named Brand of the Year by SVA in one of many competitions established 'in an effort to understand, measure, mark, and codify the meteoric'. It was honoured not for its contribution to capitalism but in recognition of its democratising purpose: 'created by the people, for the people—and it brings people together for the benefit of humanity'. Yet this award calls into question whether the design icon has lost its origin story in its adoption as a marketing brand. What does it now mean?
 
This question is as true for the pussyhat as it is for the #metoo Twitter hashtag, which recently has been at the forefront of a sexual abuse scandal primarily focused on the upper echelons of US and UK public life. The scandal has been a gift to the media. There is no better illustration of this co-option than the full-page spread published by the New York Times this month, with a 'shame' list of 40 prominent men who had resigned or been sacked as a result of sexual abuse allegations.
 
Pussyhat co-founder Zweiman has linked the Pussyhat movement with the #metoo Twitter hashtag, which was created in 2006 by social activist and community organiser Tarana Burke as part of a grassroots campaign to promote 'empowerment through empathy' among women of colour who have experienced sexual abuse. Burke reports that she was inspired to use the phrase after being unable to respond to a 13-year-old girl who confided to her that she had been sexually assaulted. Burke later wished she had simply told the girl, 'me too'. In light of the allegations about sexual abuse by Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein, in October 2017, actor Alyssa Milano revived the use of #metoo as a way to give voice to all women who had experienced sexual harassment and abuse and to illustrate the magnitude of the problem. It was quickly adopted, and has trended in more than 85 countries; arguably it has sparked what has become, in late 2017, a storm of sexual harassment and assault allegations against men in power, primarily in the media and political spheres.
 
Although Milano acknowledged Burke as the designer of #metoo, the original focus on the experiences of black women has been lost in the ensuing maelstrom. Furthermore, the celebrity stardust that accompanies the current storm runs the risk of ignoring the everyday experiences of sexual harassment and abuse that all women, from all spheres of life, face in a system that is still fundamentally patriarchal and sexist. Burke herself has said that she would like us to move away from a focus on the alleged abusers and the 'celebrity scandal' and focus on survivors and on the systemic issues that allow sexual violence to flourish.
 
Feminism has not always grappled successfully with intersectionality. In Bad Feminist, Roxanne Gay writes about feminism, with all its flaws, helping her to find her voice. But she also notes that feminism has failed to embrace women of colour, transgender women, and poor women and has failed to address intersectionality, the multitude of factors in our identities (race, gender, sexuality, disability) which are not isolated but are interwoven and shape our experiences, including experiences of harassment and abuse. When a movement or protest focuses on only one aspect (eg gender) it can misrepresent how oppression of discrimination (eg sexism) is experienced by individuals. This is but one example of the ways in which the current debate about sexual harassment and abuse has betrayed the intentions of the #metoo designer.


PictureFriederike Pezold, Pudenda-Work, 1973-74
We need to talk….
 
Michigan State University’s Museum has collected pink pussyhats as part of their protest materials archive and intends to use the hats as part of ‘Difficult Dialogue’ talking circles. The Museum’s Director says, ‘The conversations won’t be easy, we realise, but at a time when our nation is so polarised over so many seemingly intractable issues, we need to learn, all over again, how to listen to one another.’
 
We need more 'Difficult Dialogues' right now. I fear we're not listening to each other, and I wonder to what extent the design icons that have made the pussyhat and #metoo movements so prominent have contributed to that. Social media invites branding, trending and quick response; it doesn't lend itself to careful consideration of the issues. It doesn't tolerate uncomfortable viewpoints and opinions. And it is no place for those who just feel confused. Writing about the often kneejerk reactions to sexual harassment allegations in higher education, Alison Phipps suggests that punitive, 'zero tolerance' responses unhelpfully conflate behaviours and obscure the roots of individual behaviour.  Although I think individual misbehaviour and harassment should be called out, I do agree with Phipps when she says, 'Dysfunctional systems can’t be fixed by purging a few individuals. This is what I call "institutional airbrushing" – the visible blemish is removed and the underlying malaise left to fester.' Culture change is what's needed, and honesty about the systemic forces at play.
 
Phipps touches on the dangers of ignoring intersectionality, which she says 'pushes us to understand our lives as complex mixtures of victimhood and perpetration'. A crude explanation of what constitutes sexual harassment or abuse, and a one-size-fits-all approach to remedying it (though only superficially, by securing trophy heads on pikes), gets us no further in our understanding or our ability as a society to remedy the problem. And it leaves many women's experiences unrecognised: 'Seeking justice on sexual harassment without acknowledging the injustices built into the fabric of institutions will protect some at the expense of others.'

Where are the men's voices in all this? Not the men who absurdly claim they don't know what's acceptable anymore in terms of touching or commenting, and not the men, like US Vice-President Pence, who insist they will not meet or dine with a woman other than their own wives (the absurd 'Pence Rule'). We don't hear much from the men who have been accused of sexual harassment or abuse. But we hear even less from men who haven't been and who may feel wary of speaking up, of saying the 'wrong' thing. We need to recognise that among the clear red lines of unacceptable behaviour there are a range of acceptable responses that women can make. There is also, dare we say it, a level of ambiguity in interpretation and nuance and context.
​
 
We need to be having better and more robust conversations. If 2016 was newly shocking in its assaults to our political sensibilities, 2017 is depressingly retrograde. It has continued to bring in disruption (of the good and bad kind) on a massive level, but the tenor of debate remains depressingly superficial. ​

0 Comments

Lost & found at the V&A…

23/9/2015

0 Comments

 
...a series inspired by my experiences as a volunteer Welcoming Ambassador at the Victoria & Albert Museum

Signs and Wonders

We recently re-launched the free 10-minute introductory talks offered at the Grand Entrance to the museum. During the madness of Savage Beauty, the wildly popular exhibit on the work of designer Alexander McQueen, we had to take down our sign offering these to make room for the crowds queuing for tickets to the sell-out show. Now that it’s calmer, we’ve started again, this time with a hand-held sign. Not everyone wants an introduction, but many new visitors seem to welcome a quick guide to the vast collections.

If I have the luxury on focusing their attention on one piece, I choose Signs and Wonders by Edmund de Waal. This is what I say:

Welcome to the V&A, the world’s greatest museum of art and design. A schoolroom for everyone – that’s the way its first director, Henry Cole, described it - a welcoming place to inspire and provoke. We are free, we are open every day, and we open late on Fridays.
Picture
Signs and Wonders, Edmund de Waal
Let me tell you a bit about the museum. First of all, I want you to look up, inside the dome in the grand entrance. Do you see the red shelf, with white pots on it, running along the inside of the dome? That’s an installation called ‘Signs and Wonders’, by ceramic artist Edmund de Waal. He produced this work to celebrate the revamping, several years ago, of the ceramics galleries on the 6th floor of this building, which is the later of the two buildings that make up the museum. (The early building is the dark red brick one on the other side of our garden, just through the shop. It was built to replace the Brompton Boilers, the glass and iron structure designed by Prince Albert after the Great Exhibition of 1851. It opened in 1857, and it was followed by this one we’re standing in, for which Queen Victoria laid the foundation stone in 1899, just two years before she died.)

De Waal describes the pieces in this work as “a kind of love story with the ceramics collections, and they’re a kind of conversation with the collections at the V&A, they’re a kind of a very personal memory of my journeys through the V&A’s ceramics collections over the last 30 years”. He chose this location because it’s the one place in the whole of the V&A that connects the ground floor, the threshold, with those great galleries.
Picture
Before this building was built, the first ceramics galleries were actually in the older building in what is now the Silver Galleries, on the 3rd floor. If you go up and see those galleries you can still see signs of their former occupants: a frieze high up painted with the names of centres of ceramic manufacturing from 100 to 1700 AD, two columns restored to their original glory, clad with Minton majolica reliefs, and what we call the Ceramic Staircase.

Picture
Picture
Picture
The V&A’s ceramics collection is unrivalled in the world and includes more than 34,000 objects from the 4th millennium BC to the present day. The collection is particularly rich in Ceramics from Asia, the Middle East and Europe. The Victorian founders of the V&A aimed to influence taste by collecting and displaying examples of the best designs, from ironwork to textiles, jewellery to pottery. Alongside British ceramics were gathered pieces from Europe, India, China, Japan, Turkey, Morocco and Iran. They range from a Coptic jar from 5th century Egypt to a vase by contemporary artist Grayson Perry.
Picture
For a hundred years, after moving to the 6th floor of this building up to the revamping of the galleries four years ago, the galleries were a half mile of dark mahogany cabinets and glass vitrines housing, as de Waal, has said, pot after pot after pot, pots layered on pots, ‘a collection of collections’. The V&A itself describes it as being cluttered, confusing and tired. It was, de Waal says, a melancholy place, and a virtually empty one, but he spent many happy hours there as a teenager finding his way through pots, making connections.

The new ceramics galleries opened in 2010. They attempt to tell significant stories of ceramic history, and unlike the previous arrangement of collections, they now juxtapose pieces from Asia and Europe, showing the influence of different cultures on one another. Gone are the dark cabinets, and instead we can see through the glass of one cabinet into another.

This fits in well with De Waal’s vision for his installation. He often works with what he calls ‘cargoes’ of pots, groups or multiples that make connections between cultures. Influenced by Japanese porcelain pottery, de Waal says he’s drawn to its naturalness and to its “contradictory notions of strength and fragility”. Each of the 425 pots is a shade of white, contrasting with the red lacquer steel shelf. The red colour is intentional, evoking the red seal in the corner of ink paintings.

pot after pot after pot, pots layered on pots, ‘a collection of collections’

De Waal describes his piece as “responding to the specific architecture of the place”. The shelf tracks the circumference of the dome, held in only four places – an astonishing and complex engineering feat that provides a link between past (the 1909 galleries as they were) and present (the new galleries), and between the ground (the Grand Entrance) and the unreachable heights of the dome.
Picture
I love what Glenn Adamson, formerly of the V&A and now director of New York’s Museum of Arts and Design, said about Signs and Wonders, that it has the ‘if’ factor: “If you look up it is there. If you don’t look up it is still there.” He also said that “The magic of the V&A’s vast permanent collection is that each visitor discovers it anew, through a unique and completely personal process of selection.”

One attraction for me is the way the ceramics galleries (although this holds true of many of the other galleries as well) blurs the line between art and craft – an often arbitrary and unnecessary distinction.

De Waal is one of many of Britain’s, and the world’s, most successful designers, artists and craftspeople who have used the V&A as a source of ideas and stimulation over the past 150 years: Arts and Crafts pioneers William Morris and William de Morgan (Islamic design), children’s author Beatrix Potter (textiles), Italian designer Alessi (Dresser), among others. Everyone is welcome to come here to see the work of these artists alongside the historic collections that helped to inspire them.

I hope you enjoyed this introductory talk!
0 Comments

Embroidery as a political act

31/5/2015

1 Comment

 
“But you, craftswomen, modern women, who feel that your spirit is in your work, who are determined to 
lay claim to your rights (economic and moral), who believe that your feet are firmly planted in reality, 
at least y-o-u should know that your embroidery work is a documentation of your own era!”

Hannah Hoch, On Embroidery, 1918

Picture
I went this week with friends to see Cornelia Parker’s 13-metre long embroidery of the Magna Carta on display in the British Library. Actually, it’s not the Magna Carta itself, but the Wikipedia page on Magna Carta. Why Wikipedia? Parker says that she “wanted the embroidery to raise questions about where we are now with the principles laid down in the Magna Carta, and about the challenges to all kinds of freedoms that we face in the digital age. Like a Wikipedia article, this embroidery is multi-authored and full of many different voices.”

Embroidery, on one level a demonstration of feminine skill and domesticity, has a rebellious side as well. Rozsika Parker, in The Subversive Stitch, notes that it has ‘provided a weapon of resistance to the constraints of femininity’. This history of rebellion makes it a fitting medium through which to convey political messages of all types.


This year (next month) marks the 800th anniversary of the Magna Carta, one of the most famous documents ever written. Initially intended as a peace treaty between King John and his barons, the Magna Carta has become a landmark in constitutional history and is considered to be the foundation of the rule of law and a symbol of defence of individual rights and liberties.
The embroidery is the work of more than 200 individuals, ranging from prisoners working with Fine Cell Work (a social enterprise that trains prisoners in paid, skilled, creative needlework), professional embroiderers, and notables in the fields of civil liberties, justice, equality and information. For Parker, this has echoes of the Bayeaux Tapestry, which also was a communal work of many hands.

As explained in the British Library’s press release, each individual stitched words or phrases significant to them. The list ranges from director of Liberty Shami Chakrabarti (stitching ‘Charter of Liberties’) to musician Jarvis Cocker (‘Common People’) to Lord Igor Judge and Lady Judith Judge (‘Habeas Corpus’ – a phrase rejected by one of the many prisoners stitching the embroidery), and from Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales (‘user’s manual’) to Edward Snowden (‘liberty’).
Picture
Jurist Edward Coker, stitched by Shirley Smith and Zita Szabo, Embroiderers' Guild (Yorkshire and The Humber Region and Scottish Region)
“I wanted to create a portrait of our age”, says Parker. “All these people have their own opinions about democracy today and I thought carefully about the words they should stitch. For instance, Baroness Warsi, Eliza Manningham-Buller, Julian Assange and numerous prisoners have all stitched the word ‘freedom’, but all have different relationships to it.”

Reflecting the importance of the Magna Carta to the US Constitution, the embroidery includes contributions from the US Ambassador to Great Britain and staff at the US Embassy in London, who all embroidered words relating to the US Constitution.

Some contributions are particularly poignant. Former Guantanamo detainee Moazzam Begg has embroidered the words ‘held without charge’. Baroness Doreen Lawrence, mother of Stephen Lawrence, whose murder in 1993 led to a major inquiry about racism in policing, embroidered ‘justice’, ‘denial’ and ‘delay’.
Picture
Page 1 of the fourteenth-century manuscript, stitched by Jane Drummond of the Embroiderers' Guild (East Midlands Region)
The piece itself is beautiful, not least for being full of imperfections because of the range of skills used. Parker had the Wikipedia page printed onto fabric, then divided it into 87 sections. The sections were sent around the country to be embroidered by its many contributors, then reunited and sewn together by members of the Royal School of Needlework. Parker says ““I love the idea of taking something digital and making it into an analogue, hand-crafted thing.”


Cornelia Parker’s ‘Magna Carta (an embroidery)’ is on display at the British Library until 24 July 2015 (admission free).
1 Comment

Ride it, walk it – enjoying urban design

19/3/2015

1 Comment

 
Picture
Photo by Oliver Marshall 2014
PicturePhoto by Oliver Marshall 2014
The other day I found myself inadvertently experiencing some of the best new (well, new-ish) designs that make London such a great place to live and visit. I was meeting a friend for an exhibit at Tate Modern, and I took the bus to the museum – specifically the no. 11 bus, which is one of the routes using the redesigned Routemaster bus.

The Routemaster is a new take on an old and much-loved design, retaining the open entrance at the back and the spiral staircase to the upper deck. 


The open back deck means that passengers can jump on and off at will again (although I once did that and left my young daughter behind on the platform because she was too frightened to jump - she's never forgiven me for the terror she felt as the bus pulled away...). 

PicturePhoto by Oliver Marshall 2014

There are three sets of doors in the new model – front, middle, and the open one at the back. Accessibility is far better than on the old model: there is wheelchair and buggy access and a wheelchair bay opposite the middle doors. Both audio and visual stop announcements help everyone, not just those with hearing or visual impairments.

Production of the old Routemasters stopped in 1968. The new Routemasters, which hit London's roads in 2012, were designed by Thomas Heatherwick, who also designed the beautiful copper cauldron at the 2012 London Olympics. 

The new model is larger than the old one but lighter, and to minimise the perceived size the corners and edges were rounded. The windows are ribbons of glass that curve around the sides and back of the bus, and the interior is simplified, less chaotic. The diesel-electric hybrid means it’s probably gentler on the environment. It certainly is less noisy.

After getting off the bus I walked across the Millennium Bridge, known when it was first built as the Wobbly Bridge because if its precarious swaying – part of its design but so disconcerting that the bridge had to be closed immediately after opening so tweaks could be made to reduce the sway effect. It’s the first footbridge crossing the Thames to be built in more than a century.
Picture
Photo by Oliver Marshall 2014
PicturePhoto by Oliver Marshall 2014
The Millennium Bridge is a project that incorporates many elements of urban design, a collaboration between architect, engineer and sculptor (Arup, Engineers; Foster and Partners, Architects; Sir Anthony Caro, Sculptor). It is, as the project website says, a "minimal design that gives pedestrians unrivalled views of London, free from traffic and high above the Thames".

“A long span bridge, as needed to cross the Thames at this point, is a pure expression of engineering structure. A city centre footbridge, however, is equally about people and the environment - a piece of public architecture."

The bridge links (visually if not literally) St Paul’s Cathedral, designed by Christopher Wren, with Tate Modern, itself is a reworking of an impressive power station dominating the south side of the river between Westminster and Tower Bridge.
PicturePoster by Paul Catherall for Transport for London 2014
There are other aspects of urban design that we don’t often appreciate but that make it possible for us to get around and experience our surroundings and the delights of city living. The Oyster Card for one – it makes travel easy with its touch in and out technology and makes it seem almost free because we don’t have to mess with cash. 

And bus lanes make it possible for the no 11 to get through heavy mid-afternoon traffic. 

And things like wheelchair ramps, which make our streets and pavements accessible to everyone. These all require designers who apply design to everyday life. My brother-in-law Ken is one such designer; he works as an engineer for the City of San Francisco and is in charge of ramps and other urban access.

But design can also inhibit our enjoyment of our cities. I call this hostile design, and an example is in the Victoria & Albert Museum’s new gallery on Rapid Response Collecting. The gallery is dedicated to collecting objects in response to significant moments in history that touch the world of design and manufacturing and that reflect how we live today.
PictureAnti-Homeless Spikes, V&A. Photo by Margaret Doyle 2014
These Anti-Homeless Spikes were installed in summer 2014 outside an apartment building in Southwark, London, to deter vagrants and other unwanted lingerers. 

This was just months after Crisis, the homeless charity, reported that sleeping rough has increased by 75% in the past three years.



The spikes, and the 3D-printed gun that sits alongside, are the dark side of design. But there are many, many more examples of the good, the design that helps us inhabit and move freely around our public spaces.

“Design is a mirror to our society: what we buy, how things are made, how we solve problems. The things in this gallery are evidence of social, political, technological and economic change, and they show that objects mean more than their sometimes modest material value.” (V&A)

1 Comment

Lost & found at the V&A...

24/1/2015

0 Comments

 
...a series inspired by my experiences as a volunteer Welcoming Ambassador at the Victoria & Albert Museum

David is back!

At the end of last year the V&A re-opened the Weston Cast Court, one of its famous two Cast Courts, after years of restoration and repainting. 

Among the treasures that have been under wraps are the much-loved plaster cast of Michelangelo’s statue of David. The original, in Florence, was created in 1501-04; the plaster cast was made in about 1867, when plaster reproductions were all the rage. 

Few Victorians could afford to do the Grand Tour of Europe and see the original works, and these plaster casts were studied by artists and the casually curious. They fell out of favour in the 20th century, and many collections were destroyed. At the V&A, the plaster casts were housed in the two purpose-built cast courts – 24-metre-high rooms, tall enough to house the cast of Trajan’s column, albeit in two sections. The 35-metre-high original in Rome has eroded, and the V&A’s copy allows researchers and other to study the carvings in detail. 

The casts have survived because these Cast Courts had no other purpose. They are now, as Polly Toynbee points out, “ safely passed the danger zone because they have turned old, rare and precious in themselves.”
Picture
“Opened in 1873, these high glass-roofed courts were built to house gigantic casts of Europe's greatest monuments, an array of the gothic, the classical and the renaissance, incongruously hugger-mugger. A huge Celtic cross, a Pisano pulpit, an intricately carved Norwegian doorway, knight crusader effigies from English churches, a lion from Brunswick, the gates of paradise from Florence, Byzantine mosaics from Ravenna, centuries and nations apart.” 
            Polly Toynbee, The Guardian, 13 November 2014    
Picture
PicturePhoto © V&A, Museum no: REPRO.1857A-161
When the cast of David was first revealed to Queen Victoria, she was so shocked (or so it's said; I suspect she was much hardier than the story suggests) that the museum had a plaster fig leaf made to cover his privates. It was hung on the statue from two strategically placed hooks. That fig leaf now takes pride of place in a special case behind the famous statue, as a reminder of our changing sensitivities.

The V&A says that in the early years of the museum, tin fig leaves were used on other nude statuary, but the authorities at South Kensington dismissed later objections, noting that "The antique casts gallery has been very much used by private lady teachers for the instruction of young girl students and none of them have ever complained even directly." 

The Cast Courts can be enjoyed for free at the Victoria and Albert Museum.
0 Comments

The wild wonder of weeds

7/1/2015

2 Comments

 
What would the world be, once bereft
Of wet and wildness?
Let them be left,
O let them be left, wildness and wet,
Long live the weeds and the wildness yet.

                      ‘Inversnaid’, Gerard Manley Hopkins
Picture
Mona Caron, Dandelion 1 mural. www.monacaron.com
Here at Good at Looking we like to celebrate the un-celebrated. We know there are many everyday treasures that we overlook as we pass by in our rush to get from A to B. It’s wonderful to have a reminder that beauty lurks in unexpected places.

But it isn’t just about the beauty. Take weeds, for example. Urban weeds, to be exact. Are they, as the saying goes, just plants growing in the ‘wrong’ place? San Francisco-based artist and activist Mona Caron is someone who sees something more revolutionary in the tenacity of weeds.
Picture
Mona Caron at work.
“Whether invasive species or benign wildflowers, plants act as weeds when they appear clandestinely, autonomously, in surprising urban places. … 
While a big part of them are classified with the ominous-echoing term "invasive non-natives", 
all immigrant plants are native somewhere of course, and if they are here, it's because 
the global environment has been disrupted. It's a consequence of globalization. 
This is part of my metaphor." Mona Caron

(For an interesting look at an 'invasive' species, see The World Elsewhere blog post by Oliver Marshall, about the jacaranda of Harare, Zimbabwe.)

Those who won't be ignored

Also part of Caron's metaphor –which she makes solid through her creation of urban murals – is that of weeds as “symbolic of the invisible multitudes of un-valued living beings, whatever their origin, who exist at the margins, but not without gaining strength there. They may disturb when they their numbers can no longer be ignored. But in the context of suffocated environments, these undesirables are the first to carve a path for the rest of nature to follow, in due time.”

To see some of Mona Caron's work, watch her amazing video Weeds here (about 4 mins).
PictureWild garlic, in the wild
Wild medicine

Also giving new life to un-loved plants is the Phytology project, which brings together artists and botanists “to explore the medicinal properties of plants that are common to derelict urban environments”. In a ‘medicinal field’ created last year in Bethnal Green’s Nature Reserve, Phytology planted 32 wild species, generally regarded as common weeds but used in traditional medicine. They included yarrow, white dead-nettle, mallow, ribwort plantain, dandelion, red clover, and common nettle.

Phytology promotes the use of derelict space and seeks to challenge our ideas about the value and function of wildness within the urban ecosystem. Phytology’s producer, Michael Smythe says (quoted here) that both weeds and graffiti are “somewhat uncontrollable and persistent, and both offer a certain amount of complexity. To my eyes there's a direct relationship between street art and weeds, between wild plants, graffiti, urban environments, communication, and culture."  

Phytology's ‘medicinal field’ in Bethnal Green Nature Reserve opens again on 25 April 2015.

The dignity of pigeons and weeds

One artist involved in the Phytology project at Bethnal Green was illustrator Talya Baldwin, who contributed botanical drawings of dandelion, marshmallow, sweet woodruff, and 29 other species of wild plants. She says that she likes drawing things that cling to life against the odds and says of her work that it is “often about taking the time to observe and record things which are unloved, forgotten or unpopular. I draw sideshow performers, feral pigeons, weeds and rats. The drawings process is a way of recognising the subject, and giving it a sort of dignity in a quiet way.”

That’s a perspective of which Gerard Manley Hopkins would no doubt approve.

2 Comments

Lesson for Nigel Farage: A brief history of breastfeeding in western art

10/12/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
A wonderful article here by the Guardian's Jonathan Jones yesterday - responding to the leader of UKIP (the UK Independence Party), who suggested that mothers can avoid offending others by going into a corner to feed their babies. 

His comment followed a media hubbub about a young woman having tea at Claridge's who was asked to cover up with a napkin while she fed her baby. She tweeted a photo - and very quickly a mass breastfeeding protest took place outside the posh (and presumably embarrassed) establishment.

But back to Farage: as Jones explains, the works by Leonardo da Vinci, Giorgione, Caravaggio and others would have poor Nigel in a frenzy. Perhaps it will fuel UKIP's anti-Europe rhetoric and strengthen his argument that Britain should withdraw from the EU on the basis of offensive art.

0 Comments

Pure feeling

23/11/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
Etel Adnan, 'Le départ', tapestry, 2013.
Having been caught up in work-related business the past few months, I’ve neglected Good at Looking somewhat. I’ve been looking, but not writing. So it is with regrets and apologies that I am posting only now about an exhibition that ended last weekend. It’s too late to inspire readers to go and see it, but I hope it will inspire some of you to look out for future shows of her work.

I hadn’t known that I would love the work of Etel Adnan; in fact, I hadn’t even heard of this Lebanese-born artist until I happened upon her show at the White Cube in Bermondsey, which was also showing a more well-known artist, Tracey Emin. Emin’s show, ‘The Last Great Adventure is You’, features gouache nudes and large-scale embroidered versions of these beautifully rendered, thoughtful paintings. Emin is an artist who weaves her personal life into her work and lays bare the painful and traumatic as well the joyful and the tender.
Picture
Tracey Emin, from 'The Last Great Adventure is You', 2014
Picture
Tracey Emin, from 'The Last Great Adventure is You', 2014
In the room opposite we glimpsed bursts of colour that were a complete contrast to the black and white of Emin’s works. Adnan is primarily a poet and journalist – more than that, she is a leading voice in contemporary Arab American literature. Born in Beirut in 1925, and having studied in Paris and the US and lived in both the US and Lebanon, she settled in northern California in the late 1970s. The 26 paintings in this exhibit are primarily abstract landscapes – bright, expressive blocks of colour suggesting mountain, horizon, coast, sun. All are deeply resonant places for her.

Picture
Etel Adnan, 'Untitled', oil on canvas, 2014
Picture
Etel Adnan, 'Untitled', oil on canvas, 2014
The exhibition notes explains that Adnan works on a table rather than an easel, and she often applies paint directly from the tube in bold swipes across the canvas, resulting in compositions exuding intense energy. She is quoted as saying that ‘Images are not still. They are moving things. They come, they go, they disappear, they approach, they recede, and they are not even visual – ultimately they are pure feeling.’

For more on Etal Adnan, see here.

White Cube, Bermondsey: Tracey Emin, 'The Last Great Adventure is You', and Etel Adnan, 'Inside the White Cube' 8 October - 16 November 2014
0 Comments

Lost & found at the V&A…

14/9/2014

1 Comment

 
...a series inspired by my experience as a Welcoming Ambassador at the Victoria & Albert Museum

Lost at sea

Picture
This time of year is London Design Festival time at the V&A, when visitors to the museum can enjoy a number of innovative temporary installations by contemporary designers. The 9-day festival celebrates design London-wide, with more than 300 events across the city, but the V&A is the heart and hub.

One of my favourite installations is Ama, a blown-glass work inspired by, and paying homage to, the pearl-diving women of Japan. The piece, the work of Cyrpiot-born and London-based designer Michael Anastassiades in collaboration with Italian design house Flos, is made up of mouth-blown opaline spheres and brass. Laid out as a larger-than-life pearl necklace, resting in the dark on the floor of room 118 of the British Gallery, it glows and draws you in.

Picture
Ama 2014. Michael Anastassiades and Flos. Gallery 118, British Galleries, Level 4, V&A Museum
Picture
The Ama are deep-sea divers, all women, harvesting pearls, seaweed, and other treasures from the floor of the ocean. These ‘pearl diving mermaids’ were first mentioned in a Japanese poem in the oldest anthology of Japanese poetry, the Man’yoshu, in about 750.

The V&A gives an evocative description:

“The simple, even primitive beauty of these women who harvested seaweed, turban shells and abalone from beneath the coastal waters can be tracked 2000 years back in history, as recorded in the oldest Japanese anthology of poetry. Only equipped with visual acuity, lung capacity and a hunter’s instinct, Ama women would dive some 30 feet down in cold water, confronting minus zero conditions at times and only wearing a loincloth, in search of the goods lying on the ocean bed.”

I got a bit lost myself when, after seeing this beautifully mysterious installation, I did a bit of research on the Ama. Why had I never heard of them before? I discovered a blog post about the Ama, with photographs, that tells more about this community. They continue today as an example of sustainable fishing and a model of women earning an independent living. They dive up to 25 metres, for 4 hours a day, without oxygen tanks. When they surface they make a soft whistling sound, known as ‘Isobue’, to expel the breath they’ve been holding for up to 2 minutes at a time. Most are older women who have carried out this work for many years; according to the Gakuran blog, one woman continues to dive well into her 90s.

I also found an article with this description of the life of the Ama women during diving season, which:

“revolves around the ama hut, or amagoya. This is the place where the divers gather in the mornings to prepare for the day, eating, chatting and checking their equipment. After diving they return to the hut to shower, rest and warm their bodies to recover from their day’s work. The atmosphere in the hut is one of relaxation and camaraderie, for six months of the year the women are free from the usual familial and social duties they are expected to perform, and they are able to connect with other women who share their love of the ocean and diving. In the past, when career opportunities for women in a small village were limited and married women were expected to stay at home under the watchful eye of their mother in law, life as an ama must have been an attractive prospect despite the tough conditions and potential dangers.”

But the culture appears to be fading out, and the work no longer presents the unique opportunity it once did for women to earn a lucrative independent income. Partly that’s down to changes in the ocean environment; although the Ama introduced rules, including limits to diving time, to protect the ocean’s ecosystem and avoid over-fishing, pollution has reduced the growth of abalone. And as women’s career prospects have improved in the past 60 or so years, the draw of pearl diving has declined.

“Many of the divers active today are in their 50s and 60s, with very few ama aged in their 20s and 30s. The work of the ama seems to be a unique opportunity for Japanese women to engage in competitive, exciting, potentially lucrative work that provides a great amount of freedom and independence but at the same time allows women to be part of a tight-knit group of fellow enthusiasts that life as a housewife would not have afforded. In previous generations this was very rare and would explain why the job was attractive despite the harsh conditions and potential danger.”

The Ama fascinate both in their mythical image as modern-day mermaids and the pragmatic feminism of economic independence. It’s interesting that at the V&A we just had a very successful exhibit on pearls, but I don’t remember the ’pearl-diving mermaids’ featuring largely in that. Anastassiades has created a moving tribute – hopefully one that will prompt visitors to learn more about these divers and their culture. 


1 Comment

The art of summer...and a summer of art

21/7/2014

0 Comments

 
It's downright hot in London lately, and every day seems to pose a new sartorial challenge. Heat isn't something we're used to, and heat combined with unpredictable storms, relentless humidity, and (dare I say) the occasional burst of sunshine throws many people here into a panic. We don't yet have the art of summer figured out. But we do have the start of a summer of art - free, gorgeous, and right on your doorstep.

Today is the start of this year's Art Everywhere project here in the UK. Around the country, and until the end of August, 25 of the nation's favourite art from public collections will be displayed on posters, billboards, at bus stops and on taxis. The works were chosen by public vote and represent a broad cross-section of artists, styles, time periods and subjects. Here's one of my favourites.
Picture
'A Lady with a Squirrel and a Starling (Anne Lovell?)', about 1526-28, by Hans Holbein the Younger. Oil on oak panel. In the National Gallery, London.
The selected works include one of Grayson Perry's amazing tapestries from his series 'The Vanity of Small Differences', as well as sculpture by Henry Moore ('King and Queen'), a photograph, 'Iago', by Julia Margaret Cameron, and paintings by David Hockney, John Constable, Laura Knight, and many others. Be on the look out for all 25.
0 Comments

There's nowt so queer as folk: British Folk Art at Tate Britain

20/6/2014

0 Comments

 
“I say Brothers, We are three Clever Fellows to Preach Against Tippling. Tippling, Do you say, I call this Down Right, Hard, Drinking. You may say what you Please Gentlemen, but I think Wine makes Our Hearts Merry.”

'Three Sober Preachers', oil paint on canvas, c.1860

Picture
Bone cockerel, c.1797-1814
One of the questions that comes to mind when visiting the new British Folk Art exhibit at Tate Britain is whether the pieces on display are ‘art’ or ‘craft’. Does it matter what we call them? There has long been, and continues to be, a lively debate on the distinction between the two, reflecting a degree of snobbery on both sides of the divide. This exhibit doesn’t give a definitive answer, and nor should it.

The Tate, of course, is an art museum, and this exhibit is an exuberant celebration of the art we come across in our everyday lives – shop signs, for example – and the art we make in the everyday task of living, such as making quilts from scraps, collages from found objects, and driftwood sculpture. 
Picture
Tin tray covered with 'boody'
Picture
God-in-a-Bottle, 19th century, glass, wood and water
Not all of these have function as their primary purpose – one of the possible definitions of ‘craft’ as distinct from ‘art’. But nor do they necessarily have something to 'say' in the sense of deeper meaning. Many display great innovation and originality - such as the boody pieces from the north of England, using broken china (called 'boody') to create mosaic tins and boxes in the late 19th century - but weren’t created to convey an idea or emotion. With others, the purpose is unknown, such as the God–in-a-Bottle pieces associated with the construction workers and miners who were part of the Irish Catholic diaspora.
And it’s not just the terms ‘art’ and ‘craft’ that are contentious. “For many people”, writes Jeff McMillan in his introductory essay to the exhibit’s catalogue, “folk is a four-letter word. But because we all have a different and vague idea of what it refers to, it works like an umbrella to cover many other terms such as ‘vernacular’, ‘popular’, ‘rural’, ‘traditional’ and is a second cousin to labels like ’self-taught’, ‘naive’ and ‘outsider’." There is also a connection with ‘art brut’ – raw or uncooked art that is uncontaminated by culture – a term coined in the 1940s by French artist Jean Dubuffett. 
Raw it may be, but at least one folk artist made much of his royal connections. George Smith was a tailor in Tunbridge Wells, Kent, in the early 19th century. He described himself as “Artist in Cloth and Velvet Figures to His Royal Highness the Duke of Sussex”. His fabric and paper collages, such as this one in a series from 1830-40 called 'The Goosewoman', became a tourist attraction.

Picture
George Smart, 'Goosewoman', c.1830, paper and fabric collage
Picture
Alfred Wallis, 'Schooner under the Moon', c1935-36, oil paint and graphite on cardboard and plywood
The work of Alfred Wallis shows how ‘folk’ makers were sometimes feted by established artists. Wallis was ‘discovered’ by Modernist artist Ben Nicholson in an unexpected encounter in Cornwall, where Wallis had been using old pieces of cardboard as the canvases for his paintings.

Perhaps what matters is our response to the work - the meaning or intention we infer as viewers, the emotions that the piece triggers in us personally.

In her closing essay in the exhibit’s catalog, curator Ruth Kenny writes that one definition that has become a useful tool in understanding folk art is that of American sociologist Gary Alan Fine, who suggested the idea of ‘identity art’: Kenny writes: “Moving away from a focus on the finished product and the response it invokes, identity art privileges the characteristics of the creators and the circumstances and process of making.”

Many of the pieces in the exhibit are rooted in the notion of community identity – whether the community of a courting couple who together produced the Bellamy quilt during their year-long engagement, or the members of the community who contributed to the production of shop signs.

Wherever you stand on the art/craft debate (or indeed whether or not you see any distinction), you're sure to enjoy the works in this show and the questions they provoke.

British Folk Art is on at Tate Britain until 31 August 2014.
0 Comments

Accidental design

8/6/2014

1 Comment

 
"...we must be prepared for a journey of discovery, we must start without any preconceptions; most of all, we must be open to the beauties of fortuity."
                                                                                                Hannah Hoch, A Few Words on Photomontage

Sometimes you're unexpectedly struck by the beauty of everyday, accidental design, as I was the other day when walking the Thames-side path between Fulham and Hammersmith. Just look at the satisfying geometrical patterns in this metal gate leading to a pier:
Picture
Picture
It reminded me of a textile design I saw in the Danish Design Museum in Copenhagen on my short visit there last December:
Picture
Writer Alexandra Horowitz says that we miss the possibility of being surprised by what is hidden in plain sight right in front of us. In her book about everyday observation, On Looking, she explains that we forget our daily journeys to and fro because we fail to pay attention to the journey to begin with - we're too busy talking on the phone, listening to a playlist, planning dinner - and "we miss the world making itself available to be observed". Her dog inspired her to consider how these journeys can be done better. In researching the book, she took a walk around the block with several different experts, including her dog and ten others who have a distinct perspective on what they see (or smell) around them. The walks re-awakened her sense of wonder at her surroundings, something I think we could all do with from time to time.
1 Comment

Lost & found at the V&A…

26/4/2014

0 Comments

 
…a series inspired by my experiences as a volunteer Welcoming Ambassador at the Victoria & Albert Museum

Three toast racks in four centuries

“To make dry toast properly, a great deal of attention is required, much more, indeed, than people generally suppose.”

Mrs Beeton, Household Management, 1861

The toast rack appears to be a purely British invention from the late 18th century. They were sometimes referred to as ‘toast machines’, and Mrs Beeton (the 19th-century household management guru) wrote about the importance of toast racks in her well-known book Household Management in 1861, advising that “As soon as each piece is ready, it should be put into a rack, or stood upon its edges, and sent quickly to table.”

As useful objects, toast racks have somewhat fallen out of favour recently. As examples of design, however, they are timeless. I’ve taken three examples, each of which serves as a reflection of the significant design innovations/movements of their time...and a fourth that demonstrates the timelessness of good design.

1) The 18th Century - Hester Bateman toast rack

The first piece in our ‘Toast Rack Tour’ is in the Silver Galleries, room 65. It was produced in the workshop of Hester Bateman, a successful silversmith in the late 18th century. She learned her trade from her husband, and she set up her own business when he died in 1760. The V&A says that it’s likely that she managed the workshop rather than made the silver pieces herself. Her firm was one of the most technologically advanced silver firms in London at the time, exporting across England and North America.

Picture
Hester Bateman Toast Rack 1787-88. M.125-1940, Room 65, case 19, shelf 15. Photo: M. Doyle.
This silver toast rack, from Bateman's workshop in 1787-88, is elegant and modern, with its oval shape and clean lines. The rack of wirework and the base were cut from sheet. The components were machine made but assembled by hand as a result of new production techniques developed in Sheffield.

Technological developments from the 1760s led to manufacturing innovations that are demonstrated in a number of toast racks from the period. Sheffield plate, for example, was a laminate of sterling silver fused onto a copper core. It was cheaper to use than silver and meant items could be produced for less wealthy customers using designs originally made in more expensive silver. Some toast racks of this period were made almost entirely of sections of wire soldered together.

2) The 19th Century – Christopher Dresser toast rack

The second piece in our tour of toast racks is in the British Galleries, room 125, on level 4.

Freelance designer Christopher Dresser is, in my book, the King of Toast Racks. His toast racks are among his most innovative and recognisable designs – simple lines, striking profiles, form and function brought together in an apparently effortless way.
Dresser - botanist, writer, scholar, designer - was working in the late 19th century, and his ethos contrasted with that of his contemporary William Morris. Morris and his Arts and Crafts movement deplored the way industry and mass production were breaking the link between maker and user. They wanted a return to the integrity and honesty of hand crafting. Dresser, on the other hand, celebrated the opportunities offered by mass production and the way it could bring beautiful design to a wide audience.

This Dresser toast rack, made in 1880, is of electroplated nickel silver. It was mass produced and anticipates the Modernist style of the following century.

Picture
Christopher Dresser Toast Rack 1880. M.14-2005. Room 125e, case 1. Photo: © V&A Images.
3) The 20th Century – Robert Welch toast rack

The third item in the tour is in the 20th Century Gallery on level 3.

Mid-century designer Robert Welch carried on the tradition of Arts and Crafts designers but like Dresser he embraced mass production. His Campden Range from 1957 demonstrated an early use of stainless steel for dining tableware. The rocket-like shapes of his candelabra and cruet set reflect the interest in the emerging Space Age.
Picture
Robert Welch Campden Toast Rack 1958. Photo: Old Hall Club http://www.oldhallclub.co.uk
Welch was appointed as design consultant to J.J. Wiggin of Bloxwich, a family business established in 1893 that began manufacturing stainless steel tableware in 1928. The story goes that the current owner's grandmother suggested stainless steel as low-maintenance alternative to silver. The company was also known as Old Hall and it produced many notable designs in stainless steel in the mid-20th century.

This toast rack was made in 1958 and is of stainless steel. It won Welch the Council of Industrial Design Award in 1958. The judges praised its ‘economical design’, its ‘elegant and ingenious construction’ and the ‘eminently suitable material’ of stainless steel.

2) (again) The 21st Century – Alessi toast rack

And finally, we come to the last toast rack in our tour, which unfortunately is not on display in the V&A. It’s not a fourth example but a revisit of the second one - a stainless steel modern replica of the Dresser toast rack shown above, still being produced by the Italian company Alessi.



Perhaps toast racks haven't fallen completely out of fashion then. Thank goodness for that. Mrs Beeton would be pleased that standards of toast making are being maintained to this day.
Picture
Alessi Toast Rack 2005. M.14-2005. Photo: © V&A Images.
0 Comments

Got the blues?

23/3/2014

0 Comments

 
Most of us experience some version of Sunday night or Monday morning blues at some point in our lives. But the blues aren’t always a sign of feeling down. Blues in music can be exuberant. Blue skies are rejuvenating. Blues can be life affirming and a welcome shock to the system.

Take this ultramarine cockerel by contemporary artist Katharina Fritsch. Standing on the fourth plinth in Trafalgar Square, it’s an unmissable wake-up call, a cock-a-doodle-doo of a "Good morning London!"
Picture
Hahn/Cock by Katharina Fritsch (2013)
And if it could speak, it might say “Come and see the Veronese exhibit at the National Gallery just behind me.” Veronese: Magnificence in Renaissance Venice displays around 50 of the sumptuous paintings by Paolo Veronese, one of the most renowned artists in 16th-century Venice.

The colours in his works are stunning, even after more than 450 years, and the fabrics and settings are lush and detailed.
Picture
The Conversion of Mary Magdalene by Paolo Veronese (1548)
So next time you’re feeling down, head to Trafalgar Square for a bit of colour therapy and embrace the blues.
0 Comments

Lost & found at the V&A....

17/3/2014

0 Comments

 
…a series inspired by my experiences as a volunteer Welcoming Ambassador at the Victoria & Albert Museum

Madam, breakfast is served

The restaurant at the V&A was originally a place for evening meals – for Victorian folk to get a reasonably priced bite to eat after work before wandering the collection to be educated in, and inspired by, what was good taste and what was bad. 

For me, breakfast, not dinner, is the most inspiring meal of the day. These days, you can get a very decent breakfast in the Museum’s restaurant. And afterwards, you can wander the collection and marvel at objects inspired by the most inspirational meal of the day.
Picture
Breakfast table. W.64:1 to 3-1950. © V&A Images.
Start in the British Galleries, 4th floor, in a side gallery (room 118a), with a table from the mid-eighteenth century. Not just any table, but a mahogany breakfast table designed by Thomas Chippendale, furniture designer extraordinaire, and made by an unknown maker somewhere around 1760.

Apparently, Henry VIII had a walnut breakfast table in his Privy Chamber. In the 1700s, the rich and fashionable continued to have breakfast in their bedrooms, and tables were adapted to include storage for writing and reading, for those with multi-tasking skills. 
Eggs are, of course, a staple of the Anglo-Saxon breakfast (although in the past both broth and sardines were popular, and our Continental neighbours in Germany and the Netherlands prefer hams and cheeses). The rich would have had cups for boiled eggs made of silver, but the designs were for everyone and were made in less expensive materials for the less wealthy. 

This egg cup stand, also in room 118a, is from about 1790 and was made in moulded creamware, in a design probably originally made in Sheffield plate.    
Picture
Egg cup stand. C.5 to F-1945. © V&A Images.
The Museum’s description notes that although the egg stand is elegant, a “minor drawback was the fact that the eggcup feet (which provided stability) had to be smaller than the bowls in order to lodge in the holes of the stand.” A bit of a fashion victim, then, but also a survivor. The creamware examples were vulnerable to breakage, so it is rare to have one intact as this one is.

You would need a toast rack to serve the toast. While in this part of the British Galleries, have a look at the toast rack in the Woolfson Gallery, room 118 – a stunning example of toast rack design in an unusual shape of a lyre. 

This one is from 1790, not long after the toast rack first appeared on English breakfast tables, and is made of Sheffield plate (copper-plated silver).
Picture
Toast rack. M.122-1937. © V&A Images.
Picture
Dressing gown. T.395-1980. © V&A Images.

Now consider what to wear to breakfast, and head to room 125b, case 3. 

This dressing gown from the mid-nineteenth century would have been the perfect outfit – casual but beautiful and very warm (for those draughty houses). It’s made of jacquard woven silk, quilted and silk-lined, in a style of a frock coat.

Often, men wore these over their nightshirts if they had just jumped out of bed, but some put on their trousers and shirt first, then the dressing gown.

Breakfast attire can be even more outrageous, as in this dress of Dame Edna Everidge’s that pays homage to the Full English. You can see it in the Theatre and Performing Arts Gallery, a mini-museum within the V&A. 

Complete with sausages, bacon, eggs and baked beans, the dress celebrates breakfast with the irreverent fervor this most humorous of meals deserves. Dame Edna (Barry Humphries’ ‘housewife superstar’ creation) said she felt like ‘a transport caff on legs’ wearing this.

Picture
Breakfast dress for Dame Edna Everidge, designed by Stephen Adnitt, 1996 © Margaret Doyle 2014.
Who knew that breakfast at the V&A could serve up such a sumptuous smorgasbord of delights?
0 Comments

Lost & found at the V&A....

12/1/2014

0 Comments

 
....a series inspired by my experiences as a volunteer Welcoming Ambassador at the Victoria & Albert Museum

[Wo]Mankind

“One day she abruptly asked me, 'Do you like the nude, Elizabeth?' I said yes I did on the whole. Marianne: 'Well, so do I, Elizabeth, but in moderation'... ."
                                                                                              
Elizabeth Bishop, Exchanging Hats, Carcanet (1997)
Picture
Mankind by Eric Gill, 1928 (Victoria & Albert Museum)
I often wonder if visitors are shocked to be greeted by a large and luscious bare behind when they come to the V&A. When you enter the museum from the Exhibition Road entrance or the tunnel from South Kensington tube station, you’re immediately met with Eric Gill's larger-than-life sculpture of a nude woman. Carved from a single piece of Hoptonwood stone, it's a modern-day Venus de Milo and is smooth and round and very tempting to touch. 

Gill, who started out as a stone mason and letter cutter, features in our day-to-day lives more than many visitors might realise, but not for works like Mankind. Many of his works commissioned by public bodies (including for the BBC's Broadcasting House and the headquarters of London Transport) are well-known landmarks around London. He designed a number of typefaces in the mid-1920s, including Perpetua and Gill Sans, that are still widely used today. 

Mankind has been referred to as the ‘personification of womanhood’. I’m not sure about ‘personification’, but it certainly is an image of womanhood, making it all the more baffling why it's called Mankind. For me, though, it treads a fine line between personification and objectification, and I still can't decide which side of that line I think it falls on.
0 Comments

Leth is more - Danish textile design pioneer

4/1/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
On a recent visit to Copenhagen’s Museum of Design and Art, I came across this unrelentingly cheerful textile by Marie Gudme Leth (1895-1997). The textile is striking in itself, but I was amazed to learn what a significant impact Leth herself had on Danish design.

Leth transformed Danish textile production by introducing screen-printing through her Danish Calico Printing Works, a studio she set up in 1935. Before that she had travelled in Indonesia in her 20s and learned batik techniques, then experimented with block printing and set up a workshop producing block-printed textiles.

In 20th Century Pattern Design, Lesley Jackson writes that Denmark had no tradition of printed textiles until Leth established her screen-printing studio. Leth turned to screen-printing (which she learned in Germany) after finding block-printing to be too limiting in terms of production.

Her early work has many parallels with that of Phyllis Barron and Dorothy Larcher, two English textile designers who also set up their own studio in the 1920s. Barron and Larcher used labour-intensive hand-made production techniques for their block-printed textiles, including making their own natural vegetable dyes. Like Leth, Barron and Larcher used a limited colour palette and raw or unbleached linen for their block-printed textiles.

There the similarities seem to end, because Leth was interested in techniques that would allow for industrial production of printed textiles – hence her shift to screen-printing. Barron and Larcher continued with their hand methods until they closed their studio in 1939. (Interestingly, one of their apprentices in the 1920s had been Enid Marx, who went on to design for London Underground and the Utility Scheme, working closely with manufacturers on industrial production of her designs. I wrote about Marx in an earlier blog post – Walking the Block).
Learning about Leth has given me the opportunity to return to the theme of botanicals in textiles that I touched on when I wrote about Anna Maria Garthwaite. Many of Leth’s designs feature plants, both familiar ones like this cherry print (right) and more exotic types perhaps influenced by her time in Indonesia. They are highly stylised instead of naturalistic, and they have a folky feel rather than fussy. Jackson points out that even her screen-printed designs resembled block prints, with repeats of motifs set against a solid background – in keeping with Leth’s assertion that a printed fabric should not be a painting.
Picture
Kirsebaer (Cherries), Marie Gudme Leth, 1946
0 Comments

Design is here, there and everywhere

14/9/2013

0 Comments

 
That's the slogan for this year's London Design Festival, which starts today - a celebration of creative London, with a cornucopia of activities, talks, installations and displays around the city, until 22 September. The Victoria and Albert Museum is a hub for the festival - see the V&A festival site for a listing of events. Most are free, either drop-in events or installations around the galleries.

There are hundreds of events around the city during the festival - for details, see the main design festival site. 
Picture
The Wind Portal is stunning installation in a doorway within the V&A. By Lebanese designer Najla El Zein, the work is made of 5,000 paper windmills.
Picture
Picture
Picture
Oki Naganode, above and left, was made by V&A resident artist Julia Lohmann as part of her Department of Seaweed. She used Naga Kombu, a type of Japanese seaweed, which she stretched over a frame made from cane.
0 Comments

Popular art and Merz – Black Eyes and Lemonade

25/8/2013

0 Comments

 
Picture
Black Cat advertising on The Hatch, Colemans Hatch, Sussex
A person’s heaven is easily made. 'Tis but black eyes and lemonade.’
Thomas Moore, 1813

Catch it while you can! The exuberantly fun Black Eyes and Lemonade exhibit at Whitechapel Gallery is on only until next month. It celebrates the work of Barbara Jones (1912-78), the collector and curator of English popular art and author of The Unsophisticated Arts (1951). Specifically, it celebrates an exhibition curated by Jones for the Festival of Britain in 1951.
What is popular art? Is it as simple as the art of the everyday? Jones herself found it hard to define, but said the best of it is bold and fizzy (hence the name for the exhibit chosen by the curators). It certainly is that.

In effect it’s an archive exhibit, re-creating much of the original collection exhibited by Jones at the Whitechapel as part of the Festival of Britain. The gallery blurb describes the original exhibit as:

“…divided in categories such as Home, Birth-Marriage-Death, Man’s Own Image and Commerce & Industry, reflecting Jones’s ideas on popular art and museum culture, questioning the cultural values attached to handmade and machine made objects.”
Picture
Jones celebrated and championed the judgements made by collectors, makers and consumers and the collective desire for beauty. The 1951 exhibit, in the final years of post-war rationing in Britain, had the feel of a bazaar, a celebration of consuming, with every object pleasing and of equal value.  Even better is hearing how she did her collecting - driving around England with a friend in a converted taxi.

Art director Simon Costin writes about Jones and the Black Eyes and Lemonade exhibit in a post on blog Caught by the River.  Jones, Costin says, collected objects with "long folkloric histories, such as horse brasses, corn dollies, canal boat artwork, ships’ figureheads, and the pearly King & Queen outfits." But in bringing these together with "post-industrial advertising devices like the Idris Talking Lemon, beer mats, pest control adverts, shop posters", Jones

"...gave ‘folk art’ or ‘popular art’ a cultural currency, she made it relevant, exciting. And by putting the machine-made and the hand-made side by side, she blurred the boundaries between what was considered art, liberating a way of seeing that continues to widen our appreciation of the ordinary, the everyday."

I was reminded of Kurt Schwitters, the German artist who devised the concept of Merz in his collages. (Tate Britain recently had a fascinating retrospective of Schwitters’ work.) He incorporated found objects and litter, sweet wrappers and used bus tickets in his work, giving equal value to the everyday and the fine, the costly and the cheap.
Picture
In 1919 Schwitters defined Merz as:

“essentially the combination of all conceivable materials for artistic purposes, and technically the principle of equal evaluation of the individual materials….A perambulator wheel, wire-netting, string and cotton wool are factors having equal rights with paint.”

A refugee from Germany to Norway, then to England when the Germans invaded Norway in 1940, Schwitter was interned as an enemy alien for more than a year. After he was released he moved to London, where he collected discarded litter on the streets to use in his work. He was fascinated with English words and phrases and often used bits of newsprint and magazines in his collages. Unlike Jones, however, his work shows an ambivalence, even cynicism, about contemporary popular culture, especially the post-war plenty in the US and its contrast with the austerity that governed daily life in most of Europe at the time.
In very different ways, both Jones and Schwitters found treasure in the ordinary. 

Black Eyes and Lemonade, Whitechapel Gallery, free, until September 2013.
0 Comments

David Bowie Is no more at the V&A

19/8/2013

2 Comments

 
Bowie fever is over. For now, at least, and here – David Bowie Is has started its world tour and is moving on to Toronto. It was a sell-out show, and every day people queued up outside the museum to try to get tickets. It was an amazing experience, with a high-tech sound system that moved with you throughout the exhibit, with excerpts of interviews and, of course, music. 
Picture
Striped bodysuit for Aladdin Sane tour 1973. Design by Kansai Yamamoto. Photograph by Masayoshi Sukita. The David Bowie Archive 2012.
For some reason Bowie hadn’t really registered with me in my youth. Maybe it was the time - he was experimenting with music, style and personas in the 1970s, when I was still a preteen. Maybe it was the fact that I grew up in the USA, and he was definitely a Brit-grown artist. But neither of those seems adequate excuse for my lack of appreciation of him and his work. What resonates with me now – in middle age, with relatively tame musical tastes – are his energy for mining a vast range of art and talent to seek out inspiration and the creative focus he applied to doing so. There is an intellectual joy that comes across in this exploration of his work. He found inspiration in theatre, literature, visual art, performing art, fashion. He was also a painter – something maybe many of his fans don’t know. The portrait of Japanese writer Yukio Mishima (who committed suicide, or seppuku, in 1970) that Bowie painted during his years in Berlin is particularly beautiful and haunting.
Picture
Heroes album cover shoot, 1977, photograph by Masayoshi Sukita. © Sukita, courtesy the David Bowie Archive.
Bowie was a role model for all the geeky outsiders in school who wondered how to be true to themselves and survive. He played with his image, wearing his hair very short at a time when that was loaded with significance, and dyeing it bright orange. He wore outrageous costumes – like the jumpsuit he wore to perform ‘Starman’ on Top of the Pops in 1973. He described this costume as an ‘ultra-violence in Liberty fabrics’ – ultra-violence being one of the pursuits of the main character in Clockwork Orange, a book Bowie greatly admired. Writer JG Ballard described Bowie as ‘an astronaut of inner space’. He was fascinated with Orwell’s 1984 and sceptical that our obsession with technology would bring about progress.
There is a certain irony in learning that Bowie was born just after the establishment of the welfare state in Britain – 1947. The day before I saw the exhibit was a sad day for Britain – a complete rolling back of the social welfare state and a one-sided renegotiation of the social contract, brought about by drastic and nasty cuts to welfare benefits, privatisation of the NHS and withdrawal of most legal aid. How much of Bowie’s creativity was nurtured by the safety net that existed while he developed? Perhaps not a lot – he was, after all, earning a fortune by his mid-20s. But in a single generation we have gone from supporting young people to go to university (yes, in a more elitist way than now), ensuring everyone has health care even if they’re not working, and providing a social housing net that worked for many years and kept London vibrant and diverse – to a position where young people have no idea if they will be able to get jobs, whether or not they’ve gone to university, have very few housing options (especially in London), and who in their lifetime might see the disintegration of a much-admired system of universal health care. We see fear of protest (in light of the draconian sentences dealt out to some rioters and student demonstrators last year) and long-term squatters being evicted.

Rebel rebel, your face is a mess. It makes me wonder where the future Bowies will come from.

See a trailer for the film of the David Bowie Is exhibit.



2 Comments
<<Previous

    About me

    I'm Margaret Doyle, a mediator and researcher in administrative justice. I'm also a Welcoming Ambassador at the Victoria & Albert Museum, the world's leading museum of art and design.

    Categories

    All
    Alessi
    Althea McNish
    Anna Maria Garthwaite
    Architecture
    Barbara Jones
    Bermondsey
    Blue
    Breakfast
    British Library
    Cemeteries
    Charles Sargeant Jagger
    Christopher Dresser
    Colour
    Cornelia Parker
    Craft
    Democracy
    Edmund De Waal
    Embroidery
    Enid Marx
    Etal Adnan
    Folk Art
    How To Look
    Kaffe Fassett
    Kurt Schwitters
    Mae Architects
    Magna Carta
    Marie Gudme Leth
    #metoo
    Mona Caron
    Pat Taylor
    Phyllis Barron And Dorothy Larcher
    Plants
    Popular Art
    Public Art
    Rachel Whiteread
    Rule Of Thirds
    San Francisco
    Shared Spaces
    Tapestry
    Tate Britain
    Textile Design
    Tracey Emin
    UK Parliament
    Utility Covers
    V&A Museum
    Walking
    White Cube

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    May 2019
    January 2019
    August 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    September 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    September 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    January 2014
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.