Good at Looking
  • Good at Looking blog
  • About Good at Looking
  • Contact Good at Looking

The ‘violence of the administration’ in textiles

31/3/2024

1 Comment

 
​Unravel: The power and politics of textile art explores the work of artists using textiles to resist, to witness, and to protest. It asks, ‘How can textiles unpack, question, unspool, unravel and therefore reimagine the world around us?’
 
Two works in the Barbican’s exhibition are particularly powerful expressions of the assertion of state power. Hannah Ryggen’s Blood in the Grass tapestry from 1966 depicts US President Lyndon Johnson overseeing his administration's intervention in Vietnam. Johnson is a threatening magenta presence in a cowboy hat; the fields of Vietnam are tufts of lush green in stripes alternating with vivid, violent red.

Picture
​Ryggen was a committed pacifist and feminist whose textile art protested fascist and totalitarian regimes and leaders. Skye Sherwin writes of her work: ‘With their coarse weaves and tufted wool, her tapestries have a terrific, material presence. A committed communist, Ryggen used the weft and warp of the tapestry itself as a metaphor for the knotty social bonds that hold us together.’ Her Blood in the Grass is a hellish vision of state power; her Johnson is monstrous but also human and is accompanied by his pet beagle.
​Yee I-Lann’s Tikar/Meja (2018) is a series of colourful woven mats featuring images of tables. Tikar are mats largely made by women and used traditionally in the Southeast Asian Archipelago for sitting and communal gathering. I-Lann explains that in pre-colonial times, there were no tables in this part of the world, and the words used for ‘table’ – meja in Malay and mesa in Tagalog – are derived from Portuguese and Spanish; yet in this region, all languages have a name for ‘mat’. The tables in her woven mats, I-Lann says, represent this colonial power that introduced tables as an assertion of power and dominance. They also represent patriarchy; for her, tikar are essentially feminist and egalitarian, a platform without hierarchy, a form of sharing that is democratic and mutual.
Picture
​She explores what she describes as ‘the violence of administration’: ‘That violence of administration is more lethal, more violent, than a gun. With a gun I may just shoot you, but with a table, with administration, I will tell you who you are, what your history is, what is valuable to be kept in a museum and what is not, what language you should use, what languages you should learn, what is of value.’
 
There is a sense that, even when not associated with violence of colonial power, tables and desks are markers of the authority of the state. They are barriers, and they often connote hierarchical status. They dominate the spaces in which we as individuals come across the power of the state – the teacher’s desk at the front of a classroom of neatly ordered pupils’ desks, the table with the glass barrier in the benefits office, the raised podium of the judge in court. They put us in our place.
Picture
The exhibition has been beset by its own political controversy. Several artists chose to withdraw their work after the Barbican Centre declined to host the London Review of Books’ Winter Lecture series because of discomfort expressed about the topic of one lecture – Pankaj Mishra’s ‘The Shoah after Gaza’. (The Barbican refers to its disappointment that it was ‘not able to get the necessary logistical arrangements in place to host the LRB Winter Series.’)

I-Lann took an unusual stance – she chose to include Tikar/Meja in the exhibition, but she made a statement and requested that the Barbican display this on a table in front of her work. In that statement, she says that she was ‘deeply troubled’ by the accusations directed at the Barbican. To withdraw or to participate suggested to her a binary choice that is the antithesis of what her work is about. Tikar/Meja is a work that recognises not just the violence of administration but the other forces at play, including censorship. I-Lann writes: ‘At the table, through tables, through administration, through education systems, officiated histories – through institutions. The actions performed at these metaphoric and literal tables enter the mind and become inherited…. The mat draws from other power systems and calls for people to share a platform together.’
 
Unravel: The power and politics of textile art is at the Barbican Centre in London until 26 May 2024.
1 Comment

    About me

    I'm Margaret Doyle, a mediator and researcher in administrative justice. I'm also a Welcoming Ambassador at the Victoria & Albert Museum, the world's leading museum of art and design.

    Categories

    All
    Alessi
    Althea McNish
    Anna Maria Garthwaite
    Architecture
    Barbara Jones
    Barbican
    Bermondsey
    Blue
    Breakfast
    British Library
    Cemeteries
    Charles Sargeant Jagger
    Christopher Dresser
    Colour
    Cornelia Parker
    Craft
    Democracy
    Edmund De Waal
    Embroidery
    Enid Marx
    Etal Adnan
    Folk Art
    Hannah Ryggen
    How To Look
    Kaffe Fassett
    Kurt Schwitters
    Mae Architects
    Magna Carta
    Marie Gudme Leth
    #metoo
    Mona Caron
    Pat Taylor
    Phyllis Barron And Dorothy Larcher
    Plants
    Politics
    Popular Art
    Power
    Public Art
    Rachel Whiteread
    Rule Of Thirds
    San Francisco
    Shared Spaces
    Tapestry
    Tate Britain
    Textile Design
    Textiles
    Tracey Emin
    UK Parliament
    Utility Covers
    V&A Museum
    Walking
    White Cube
    Yee I-Lann

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    March 2024
    May 2019
    January 2019
    August 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    September 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    September 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    January 2014
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.